Sociological Debates

  • Should sociologists engage with social psychologists when studying values?
    • Vaisey vs. Martin/Lembo
      • Martin, John Levi and Alessandra Lembo. 2020. “On the Other Side of Values.” American Journal of Sociology 126: 52–98.
      • Vaisey, Stephen. 2021. “Welcome to the Real World: Escaping the Sociology of Culture and Cognition.” Sociological Forum 36: SI: 1297–1315. https://doi.org/10.1111/socf.12770
      • Martin & Lembo. 2021. “Response to Vaisey.” Sociological Forum. DOI: 10.1111/socf.12790
  • Is income segregation increasing in the U.S.?
    • Reardon/Bischoff vs. Logan
    • This debate goes back to 2011, but one might start with Logan et al. (2018):
      • Logan, John R., Andrew Foster, Jun Ke, and Fan Li. 2018. “The Uptick in Income Segregation: Real Trend or Random Sampling Variation?” American Journal of Sociology 124(1):185–222. doi: 10.1086/697528.
    • Reardon et al. (2018) article which is partly a response:
      • Reardon, Sean F., Kendra Bischoff, Ann Owens, and Joseph B. Townsend. 2018. “Has income segregation really increased? Bias and bias correction in sample-based segregation estimates.” Demography 55(6): 2129-2160.
    • Then Logan replied, also in Demography with:
      • Logan, John R., Andrew Foster, Hongwei Xu, and Wenquan Zhang. 2020. “Income Segregation: Up or Down, and for Whom?” Demography 57(5):1951–74. doi: 10.1007/s13524-020-00917-0.
  • Are Americans getting lonelier?
    • McPherson/Smith-Lovin/Brashears vs. Fischer vs. Paik & Sanchagrin
    • McPherson, Miller, Lynn Smith-Lovin, and Matthew E. Brashears. 2006. Social isolation in America: Changes in core discussion networks over two decades. American Sociological Review, 71 (3): 353-371. (See also Erratum. 2008. ASR, 73 (6): 1022.)
    • Fischer, Claude S. 2009. The 2004 GSS finding of shrunken social networks: An artifact? American Sociological Review, 74 (4): 657-669.
    • McPherson, Miller, Lynn Smith-Lovin, and Matthew Brashears. 2009. Models and marginals: Using survey evidence to study social networks. American Sociological Review, 74 (4): 670-681.
    • Braschears, Matthew E. 2011. Small networks and high isolation? A reexamination of American discussion networks. Social Networks, 33: 331-341.
    • Paik, Ian, and Kenneth Sanchagrin. 2013. Social isolation in America: An artifact. American Sociological Review, 78 (3): 339-360.
    • Could include work by Putnam and Klinenberg, too.
  • Did the TV Show “16 and Pregnant” reduce teen childbearing?
    • Kearney/Levine vs. Jaeger/Joyce/Kaestner
    • Rather technical (Diff-in-diff design)
  • Is racial identity fluid?
    • Saperstein/Penner vs. Alba et al. vs. Kramer et al.
      • Saperstein A, Penner AM. 2012. Racial fluidity and inequality in the United States. Am. J. Sociol. 118:676– 727
      • Alba RD, Lindeman S, Insolera NE. 2016. Is race really so fluid? Revisiting Saperstein and Penner’s empirical claims. Am. J. Sociol. 122:247–62
      • Kramer R, DeFina R, Hannon L. 2016. Racial rigidity in the United States: comment on Saperstein and Penner. Am. J. Sociol. 122:233–46
      • Saperstein A, Penner AM. 2016. Still searching for a true race? Reply to Kramer et al. and Alba et al. Am. J. Sociol. 122:263–85
  • Does moving to a richer neighborhood improve one’s life outcomes?
    • Clampet-Lundquist and Massey vs. Ludwig vs. Sampson in AJS
    • Moving to opportunity
  • Are Black-white disparities in earnings a lingering consequence of skills differentials or the product of active discrimination?
    • Pager vs. Heckman (Gaddis in Social Forces on this, too)
    • Match pair audit studies
  • Are liberals or leftists better equipped to address crime and state violence?
    • the Tony Platt vs. Jonathan Simon debates in the special issue of Social Justice from 2014.
  • Can we separate economic class from cultural status (i.e. economic capital from social capital?)
    • Chan vs. Flemmen/Jarness/Rosenlund
  • Tak Wing Chan. 2019. “Understanding Cultural Omnivores: Social and Political Attitudes.” The British Journal of Sociology 69(1): 784-806.
  • Flemmen, Magne, Vegard Jarness, and Lennart Rosenlund. 2019. “Omnivorousness and Openness: Comments to Tak Wing Chan.” The British Journal of Sociology 69(1): 807-815.
  • Flemmen, Magne, Vegard Jarness, and Lennart Rosenlund. 2019. “Class and Status: On the Misconstrual of the Conceptual Distinction and a Neo-Bourdieusian Alternative.” The British Journal of Sociology 69(1): 816-866.
  • Tak Wing Chan. 2019. “Understanding Social Status: A Reply to Flemmen, Jarness and Rosenlund.” The British Journal of Sociology 69(1): 867-881. 
  • Lambert, Paul S. 2019. “Class, Status and Lifestyle: On Omnivores, Distinction, and the Measurement of Social Position.” The British Journal of Sociology 69(1): 887-891.
    • Pay special attention to Lambert’s comment on methodological differences.
    • Optional: Lazardo’s entry in this issue. It’s a fun one.
  • Should research reflect or resist common sense?
    • Watts vs. Turco/Zuckerman
    • Watts, D., 2014. Common sense and sociological explanations. AJS. Turco & Zuckerman., 2017. Verstehen for Sociology: Comment on Watts. AJS.
    • Watts, 2017. Response to Turco and Zuckerman’s “Verstehen for Sociology”. AJS.
  • Scrutinizing the Heat
    • Duneier vs. Klinenberg
    • Duneier criticized Klinenberg in Comtemp Soc (partly as retaliation against EK’s advisor, LW), Klinenberg responded. Then there was another exchange in ASR in 2006.
  • What social network analysis can and can’t do
    • Some examples of network analysis:
      • Rossman, G., Esparza, N. and Bonacich, P., 2010. I’d like to thank the Academy, team spillovers, and network centrality. American Sociological Review75(1), pp.31-51.
      • DiMaggio, P. and Garip, F., 2011. How network externalities can exacerbate intergroup inequality. American Journal of Sociology116(6), pp.1887-1933.
  • Will the U.S. be a majority minority country in 2042?
    • Alba vs. Census Report
  • Do immigrants fare better in ethnic enclaves?
    • Portes/Jensen v. Sanders/Nee
  • Is obesity contagious?
    • Fowler/Christakis and critics
    • The study that started it all: Christakis, Nicholas A. and James H. Fowler. 2007. “The Spread of Obesity in a Large Social Network over 32 Years.” New England Journal of Medicine 357:370–79.
    • Critique: Cohen-Cole, Ethan and Jason M. Fletcher. 2008. “Detecting Implausible Social Network Effects in Acne, Height, and Headaches: Longitudinal Analysis.” British Med- ical Journal 337:a2533.
    • Critique: Shalizi, Cosma Rohilla and Andrew C. Thomas. 2011. “Homophily and Contagion Are Generically Confounded in Observational Social Network Studies.” Sociological Methods and Research 40:211–39.
    • Critique: Noel, Hans, and Brendan Nyhan. 2011. “The ‘Unfriending’ Problem: The Consequences of Homophily in Friendship Retention for Causal Estimates of Social Influence.” Social Networks 33(3):211–18. doi: 10.1016/j.socnet.2011.05.003.
    • Additional analysis: VanderWeele 2011. “Sensitivity Analysis for Contagion Effects in Social Networks.” Sociological Methods and Research 40:240–55.
    • Rebuttal:Christakis, Nicholas A. and James H. Fowler. 2013. “Social Contagion Theory: Examining Dynamic Social Networks and Human Behavior.” Statistics in Medicine 32:556–77.

Theoretical Debates